| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PMedia Member
Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 136
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:51 am Post subject: DirectShow vs QuickTime vs. Direct x |
|
|
I'm having trouble with displaying video. I am using on board video on a second monitor here's what I've come up with
Direct Show Images look the best but everytime I click on the timeline it jumps out of full screen
QuickTime: Look bad and blocky but stay full screen. It also seem to be faster to navigate around while editing
Direct X. Ok images - Jumps out of Full screen and shows the system down the worst.
Are these known bugs or can someone tell me how to use Direct Show and it not jump out of full screen all the time?
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew Mottl Member
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 810 Location: Düsseldorf, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey there,
what video chip is it?
I use Direct-Show, and what I do is set my second monitor in Windows to be in "Theatre" or "Fullscreen Overlay" mode (depending on how the manufacturer calls it).
Now, anytime I have Nuendo open in Direct-Show (or a video in say like VLC player) Windows outputs that in fullscreen out my TV-Out. Great for post!
Should be found somewhere in your graphics card settings
Hope it helps!
Andrew |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PMedia Member
Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 136
|
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok cool I'll have a look
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sprachlabor Junior Member
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 53 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First of all: Forget DirectX. It's known to be buggy and is not recommended at all.
Weapon of choice vs Nuendo is Quicktime. Quicktime is a container, how ugly or blocky
it looks depends on the codec and resolution you use. Quicktime with PhotoJPEG
(.mov-files) or MotionJPEG (.avi-files) seems to work flawless and stable with fairly good
quality, as many people in this forum use it in a professional environment (me too).
(Using it with a BlackMagic Intensity video card you can even output FullHD via HDMI
without any problems). Another pro on Quicktime is that it allows multiple videos
in the timeline, even rudimentary cutting is possible. DirectShow doesn't allow this.
I hope that helps.
Bye,
Eike _________________ 5x N4.1/WinXP Pro SP2/C2D E6750/Asus P5K pro/2 GB/RME HDSP 9632/Blackmagic Intensity pro 1.8.1/GF 8500GT/Kensington Expert Mouse |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew Mottl Member
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 810 Location: Düsseldorf, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unfortunately however, QT doesn't allow fullscreen output via the graphics card.
DirectShow does (for me at least). And it seems to run better.
I do have QT-Alternative installed though (v. 1.68, the newer ones don't really work for me). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stevie Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Posts: 470 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was actually a big fan of Quicktime. Everything worked, but now, since I resized a video I get CPU spikes all over it (I'm not using
a dedicated pci card). This fact makes it unusable. I now tried to switch to DShow. It worked okay with MJPEG movies, but I don't
see any pictures when FF and scrubbing. Can this be fixed somehow? _________________ Stephan Römer - Composer & Sound Designer New website online |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|